Automatic generation of a large dictionary with concreteness/abstractness ratings based on a small human dictionary
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Concrete/abstract words are used in a growing number of psychological and neurophysiological research. For a few languages, large dictionaries have been created manually. This is a very time-consuming and costly process. To generate large high-quality dictionaries of concrete/abstract words automatically one needs extrapolating the expert assessments obtained on smaller samples. The research question that arises is how small such samples should be to do a good enough extrapolation. In this paper, we present a method for automatic ranking concreteness of words and propose an approach to significantly decrease amount of expert assessment. The method has been evaluated on a large test set for English. The quality of the constructed dictionaries is comparable to the expert ones. The correlation between predicted and expert ratings is higher comparing to the state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.
Builds on
5 of 46 references.
References · 5
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2018Predicting Concreteness and Imageability of Words Within and Across Languages via Word Embeddingscited by 10
- 2018Learning Concept Abstractness Using Weak Supervisioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.