mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automatic generation of a large dictionary with concreteness/abstractness ratings based on a small human dictionary

arXiv 2206.06200 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2022cs.CL cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concrete/abstract words are used in a growing number of psychological and neurophysiological research. For a few languages, large dictionaries have been created manually. This is a very time-consuming and costly process. To generate large high-quality dictionaries of concrete/abstract words automatically one needs extrapolating the expert assessments obtained on smaller samples. The research question that arises is how small such samples should be to do a good enough extrapolation. In this paper, we present a method for automatic ranking concreteness of words and propose an approach to significantly decrease amount of expert assessment. The method has been evaluated on a large test set for English. The quality of the constructed dictionaries is comparable to the expert ones. The correlation between predicted and expert ratings is higher comparing to the state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.

Builds on

5 of 46 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  4. 2018Predicting Concreteness and Imageability of Words Within and Across Languages via Word Embeddingscited by 10
  5. 2018Learning Concept Abstractness Using Weak Supervisioncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.