Learning to Detect with Constant False Alarm Rate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the use of machine learning for hypothesis testing with an emphasis on target detection. Classical model-based solutions rely on comparing likelihoods. These are sensitive to imperfect models and are often computationally expensive. In contrast, data-driven machine learning is often more robust and yields classifiers with fixed computational complexity. Learned detectors usually provide high accuracy with low complexity but do not have a constant false alarm rate (CFAR) as required in many applications. To close this gap, we propose to add a term to the loss function that promotes similar distributions of the detector under any null hypothesis scenario. Experiments show that our approach leads to near CFAR detectors with similar accuracy as their competitors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2022.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2014Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 1,218
- 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 290
- 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
- 2018Learning to Detectcited by 60
- 2020Achieving Equalized Odds by Resampling Sensitive Attributescited by 42
- 2021Learning to Estimate Without Biascited by 9
- 2021SignalNet: A Low Resolution Sinusoid Decomposition and Estimation Networkcited by 5
- 2018Machine Learning For In-Region Location Verification In Wireless Networkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.