The Missing Link: Finding label relations across datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computer vision is driven by the many datasets available for training or evaluating novel methods. However, each dataset has a different set of class labels, visual definition of classes, images following a specific distribution, annotation protocols, etc. In this paper we explore the automatic discovery of visual-semantic relations between labels across datasets. We aim to understand how instances of a certain class in a dataset relate to the instances of another class in another dataset. Are they in an identity, parent/child, overlap relation? Or is there no link between them at all? To find relations between labels across datasets, we propose methods based on language, on vision, and on their combination. We show that we can effectively discover label relations across datasets, as well as their type. We apply our method to four applications: understand label relations, identify missing aspects, increase label specificity, and predict transfer learning gains. We conclude that label relations cannot be established by looking at the names of classes alone, as they depend strongly on how each of the datasets was constructed.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2022.
Builds on
15 of 35 references.
References · 15
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
- 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 864
- 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 802
- 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
- 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 315
- 2019Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 245
- 2021Simple multi-dataset detectioncited by 127
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023DaTaSeg: Taming a Universal Multi-Dataset Multi-Task Segmentation Modelcited by 31
- 2023ScaleDet: A Scalable Multi-Dataset Object Detectorcited by 16
- 2023Hybrid Open-set Segmentation with Synthetic Negative Datacited by 8
- 2022Automatic universal taxonomies for multi-domain semantic segmentationcited by 7
- 2022Weakly supervised training of universal visual concepts for multi-domain semantic segmentationcited by 5
- 2024MC-PanDA: Mask Confidence for Panoptic Domain Adaptationcited by 4
- 2023Label Smarter, Not Harder: CleverLabel for Faster Annotation of Ambiguous Image Classification with Higher Qualitycited by 3
- 2024Automated Label Unification for Multi-Dataset Semantic Segmentation with GNNscited by 2
- 2026MC-PanDA++: Simpler, Stronger, and More Robust Domain-Adaptive Panoptic Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026MC-PanDA++: Simpler, Stronger, and More Robust Domain-Adaptive Panoptic Segmentation30 Sep 2026
- 2024MC-PanDA: Mask Confidence for Panoptic Domain Adaptation19 Jul 2024
- 2024Automated Label Unification for Multi-Dataset Semantic Segmentation with GNNs15 Jul 2024
- 2023ScaleDet: A Scalable Multi-Dataset Object Detector8 Jun 2023
- 2023DaTaSeg: Taming a Universal Multi-Dataset Multi-Task Segmentation Model2 Jun 2023
- 2023Label Smarter, Not Harder: CleverLabel for Faster Annotation of Ambiguous Image Classification with Higher Quality22 May 2023
- 2023Hybrid Open-set Segmentation with Synthetic Negative Data19 Jan 2023
- 2022Weakly supervised training of universal visual concepts for multi-domain semantic segmentation20 Dec 2022
- 2022Automatic universal taxonomies for multi-domain semantic segmentation18 Jul 2022