mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An efficient semi-supervised quality control system trained using physics-based MRI-artefact generators and adversarial training

arXiv 2206.03359 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large medical imaging data sets are becoming increasingly available, but ensuring sample quality without significant artefacts is challenging. Existing methods for identifying imperfections in medical imaging rely on data-intensive approaches, compounded by a scarcity of artefact-rich scans for training machine learning models in clinical research. To tackle this problem, we propose a framework with four main components: 1) artefact generators inspired by magnetic resonance physics to corrupt brain MRI scans and augment a training dataset, 2) abstract and engineered features to represent images compactly, 3) a feature selection process depending on the artefact class to improve classification, and 4) SVM classifiers to identify artefacts. Our contributions are threefold: first, physics-based artefact generators produce synthetic brain MRI scans with controlled artefacts for data augmentation. This will avoid the labour-intensive collection and labelling process of scans with rare artefacts. Second, we propose a pool of abstract and engineered image features to identify 9 different artefacts for structural MRI. Finally, we use an artefact-based feature selection block that, for each class of artefacts, finds the set of features providing the best classification performance. We performed validation experiments on a large data set of scans with artificially-generated artefacts, and in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial where real artefacts were identified by experts, showing that the proposed pipeline outperforms traditional methods. In particular, our data augmentation increases performance by up to 12.5 percentage points on accuracy, precision, and recall. The computational efficiency of our pipeline enables potential real-time deployment, promising high-throughput clinical applications through automated image-processing pipelines driven by quality control systems.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  5. 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
  6. 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
  7. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
  8. 2018Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detectioncited by 115
  9. 2018Unsupervised Detection of Lesions in Brain MRI using constrained adversarial auto-encoderscited by 83
  10. 2020Unsupervised Lesion Detection via Image Restoration with a Normative Priorcited by 65
  11. 2018An Adversarial Learning Approach to Medical Image Synthesis for Lesion Detectioncited by 30
  12. 2019A deep learning framework for quality assessment and restoration in video endoscopycited by 24
8 more
  1. 2018Automatic CNN-based detection of cardiac MR motion artefacts using k-space data augmentation and curriculum learningcited by 21
  2. 2020MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Datacited by 12
  3. 2022Image quality assessment for machine learning tasks using meta-reinforcement learningcited by 10
  4. 2021Automatic quality control of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images for a clinical data warehousecited by 8
  5. 2020A Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Model for Decoupling Sources of MRI Image Qualitycited by 7
  6. 2019Diagnostic Image Quality Assessment and Classification in Medical Imaging: Opportunities and Challengescited by 6
  7. 2020Frequency learning for image classificationcited by 5
  8. 2021Looking at the whole picture: constrained unsupervised anomaly segmentationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.