mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Machine learning models for determination of weldbead shape parameters for gas metal arc welded T-joints -- A comparative study

arXiv 2206.02794 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The shape of a weld bead is critical in assessing the quality of the welded joint. In particular, this has a major impact in the accuracy of the results obtained from a numerical analysis. This study focuses on the statistical design techniques and the artificial neural networks, to predict the weld bead shape parameters of shielded Gas Metal Arc Welded (GMAW) fillet joints. Extensive testing was carried out on low carbon mild steel plates of thicknesses ranging from 3mm to 10mm. Welding voltage, welding current, and moving heat source speed were considered as the welding parameters. Three types of multiple linear regression models (MLR) were created to establish an empirical equation for defining GMAW bead shape parameters considering interactive and higher order terms. Additionally, artificial neural network (ANN) models were created based on similar scheme, and the relevance of specific features was investigated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The results reveal that MLR-based approach performs better than the ANN based models in terms of predictability and error assessment. This study shows the usefulness of the predictive tools to aid numerical analysis of welding.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2022.

Builds on

3 of 23 references.

References · 3

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,601

Built on by

Not cited yet.