Perspectives of Non-Expert Users on Cyber Security and Privacy: An Analysis of Online Discussions on Twitter
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current research on users` perspectives of cyber security and privacy related to traditional and smart devices at home is very active, but the focus is often more on specific modern devices such as mobile and smart IoT devices in a home context. In addition, most were based on smaller-scale empirical studies such as online surveys and interviews. We endeavour to fill these research gaps by conducting a larger-scale study based on a real-world dataset of 413,985 tweets posted by non-expert users on Twitter in six months of three consecutive years (January and February in 2019, 2020 and 2021). Two machine learning-based classifiers were developed to identify the 413,985 tweets. We analysed this dataset to understand non-expert users` cyber security and privacy perspectives, including the yearly trend and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We applied topic modelling, sentiment analysis and qualitative analysis of selected tweets in the dataset, leading to various interesting findings. For instance, we observed a 54% increase in non-expert users` tweets on cyber security and/or privacy related topics in 2021, compared to before the start of global COVID-19 lockdowns (January 2019 to February 2020). We also observed an increased level of help-seeking tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis revealed a diverse range of topics discussed by non-expert users across the three years, including VPNs, Wi-Fi, smartphones, laptops, smart home devices, financial security, and security and privacy issues involving different stakeholders. Overall negative sentiment was observed across almost all topics non-expert users discussed on Twitter in all the three years. Our results confirm the multi-faceted nature of non-expert users` perspectives on cyber security and privacy and call for more holistic, comprehensive and nuanced research on different facets of such perspectives.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2022.
Builds on
13 of 103 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019A BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Hate Speech Detection in Online Social Mediacited by 95
- 2019Visualizing and Understanding the Effectiveness of BERTcited by 67
- 2020Cost-Sensitive BERT for Generalisable Sentence Classification with Imbalanced Datacited by 14
- 2019Processing Tweets for Cybersecurity Threat Awarenesscited by 10
- 2021(Mis)alignment Between Stance Expressed in Social Media Data and Public Opinion Surveyscited by 8
- 2019Cyberthreat Detection from Twitter using Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2018User Perceptions of Smart Home IoT Privacycited by 5
- 2018A Longitudinal Analysis of the Public Perception of the Opportunities and Challenges of the Internet of Thingscited by 2
- 2020Attributes affecting user decision to adopt a Virtual Private Network (VPN) appcited by 1
- 2021When Googling it doesn't work: The challenge of finding security advice for smart home devicescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.