Fast and Accurate Error Simulation for CNNs against Soft Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The great quest for adopting AI-based computation for safety-/mission-critical applications motivates the interest towards methods for assessing the robustness of the application w.r.t. not only its training/tuning but also errors due to faults, in particular soft errors, affecting the underlying hardware. Two strategies exist: architecture-level fault injection and application-level functional error simulation. We present a framework for the reliability analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) via an error simulation engine that exploits a set of validated error models extracted from a detailed fault injection campaign. These error models are defined based on the corruption patterns of the output of the CNN operators induced by faults and bridge the gap between fault injection and error simulation, exploiting the advantages of both approaches. We compared our methodology against SASSIFI for the accuracy of functional error simulation w.r.t. fault injection, and against TensorFI in terms of speedup for the error simulation strategy. Experimental results show that our methodology achieves about 99% accuracy of the fault effects w.r.t. SASSIFI, and a speedup ranging from 44x up to 63x w.r.t. TensorFI, that only implements a limited set of error models.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2022.
Builds on
6 of 50 references.
References · 6
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2014Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embeddingcited by 288
- 2020TensorFI: A Flexible Fault Injection Framework for TensorFlow Applicationscited by 22
- 2019Controlling Steering Angle for Cooperative Self-driving Vehicles utilizing CNN and LSTM-based Deep Networkscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023A Systematic Literature Review on Hardware Reliability Assessment Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2023Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniquescited by 4
- 2024ProAct: Progressive Training for Hybrid Clipped Activation Function to Enhance Resilience of DNNscited by 1
- 2025FORTALESA: Fault-Tolerant Reconfigurable Systolic Array for DNN Inferencecited by 1
- 2024Concurrent Linguistic Error Detection (CLED): a New Methodology for Error Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026CoG-Guided Weight Correction for Fault-Tolerant Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026TreeFI: Value-Aware Statistical Fault Injection for Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026TreeFI: Value-Aware Statistical Fault Injection for Deep Neural Networks4 Sep 2026
- 2026CoG-Guided Weight Correction for Fault-Tolerant Deep Neural Networks17 Jul 2026
- 2025FORTALESA: Fault-Tolerant Reconfigurable Systolic Array for DNN Inference6 Mar 2025
- 2024ProAct: Progressive Training for Hybrid Clipped Activation Function to Enhance Resilience of DNNs10 Jun 2024
- 2024Concurrent Linguistic Error Detection (CLED): a New Methodology for Error Detection in Large Language Models25 Mar 2024
- 2023Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques27 Sep 2023
- 2023A Systematic Literature Review on Hardware Reliability Assessment Methods for Deep Neural Networks9 May 2023