mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Delving into the Openness of CLIP

arXiv 2206.01986 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) formulates image classification as an image-to-text matching task, i.e., matching images to the corresponding natural language descriptions instead of discrete category IDs. This allows for open-vocabulary visual recognition, where the model can recognize images from an open class set (also known as an open vocabulary) in a zero-shot manner. However, evaluating the openness of CLIP-like models is challenging, as the models are open to arbitrary vocabulary in theory, but their accuracy varies in practice. To address this, we resort to an incremental perspective to assess the openness through vocabulary expansions, and define extensibility to measure a model's ability to handle novel classes. Our evaluation shows that CLIP-like models are not truly open, and their performance deteriorates as the vocabulary expands. We further dissect the feature space of CLIP from the perspectives of representation alignment and uniformity. Our investigation reveals that the overestimation of openness is due to confusion among competing text features, rather than a failure to capture the similarity between image features and text features of novel classes. We hope that our investigation and analysis will facilitate future research on the CLIP openness issue.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2022.

Builds on

28 of 52 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  7. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  8. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
  9. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  10. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  11. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  12. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
16 more
  1. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
  2. 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 903
  3. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  4. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  5. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  6. 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modelingcited by 429
  7. 2020Open-Vocabulary Object Detection Using Captionscited by 427
  8. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  9. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
  10. 2014Towards Open World Recognitioncited by 226
  11. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  12. 2018Predicting the Generalization Gap in Deep Networks with Margin Distributionscited by 111
  13. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Processing: Overview, Challenges and Futurecited by 104
  14. 2020Behind the Scene: Revealing the Secrets of Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 90
  15. 2018Open-world Learning and Application to Product Classificationcited by 39
  16. 2021Learning Relation Alignment for Calibrated Cross-modal Retrievalcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 4.

10 papers.