mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Use of NLP-Based Text Representation Techniques to Support Requirement Engineering Tasks: A Systematic Mapping Review

arXiv 2206.00421 ↗First posted 17 May 2022cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is widely used to support the automation of different Requirements Engineering (RE) tasks. Most of the proposed approaches start with various NLP steps that analyze requirements statements, extract their linguistic information, and convert them to easy-to-process representations, such as lists of features or embedding-based vector representations. These NLP-based representations are usually used at a later stage as inputs for machine learning techniques or rule-based methods. Thus, requirements representations play a major role in determining the accuracy of different approaches. In this paper, we conducted a survey in the form of a systematic literature mapping (classification) to find out (1) what are the representations used in RE tasks literature, (2) what is the main focus of these works, (3) what are the main research directions in this domain, and (4) what are the gaps and potential future directions. After compiling an initial pool of 2,227 papers, and applying a set of inclusion/exclusion criteria, we obtained a final pool containing 104 relevant papers. Our survey shows that the research direction has changed from the use of lexical and syntactic features to the use of advanced embedding techniques, especially in the last two years. Using advanced embedding representations has proved its effectiveness in most RE tasks (such as requirement analysis, extracting requirements from reviews and forums, and semantic-level quality tasks). However, representations that are based on lexical and syntactic features are still more appropriate for other RE tasks (such as modeling and syntax-level quality tasks) since they provide the required information for the rules and regular expressions used when handling these tasks. In addition, we identify four gaps in the existing literature, why they matter, and how future research can begin to address them.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 148 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2022.

Builds on

8 of 148 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2018Semantically Enhanced Software Traceability Using Deep Learning Techniquescited by 22
  3. 2016Representation learning for very short texts using weighted word embedding aggregationcited by 12
  4. 2016Rapid quality assurance with Requirements Smellscited by 11
  5. 2016A deep learning model for estimating story pointscited by 10
  6. 2019Learning to Identify Security-Related Issues Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 4
  7. 2020Topic Modeling on User Stories using Word Mover's Distancecited by 2
  8. 2021Issue Link Label Recovery and Prediction for Open Source Softwarecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

5 papers.