mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

In the Eye of the Beholder: Robust Prediction with Causal User Modeling

arXiv 2206.00416 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.GT cs.IRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately predicting the relevance of items to users is crucial to the success of many social platforms. Conventional approaches train models on logged historical data; but recommendation systems, media services, and online marketplaces all exhibit a constant influx of new content -- making relevancy a moving target, to which standard predictive models are not robust. In this paper, we propose a learning framework for relevance prediction that is robust to changes in the data distribution. Our key observation is that robustness can be obtained by accounting for how users causally perceive the environment. We model users as boundedly-rational decision makers whose causal beliefs are encoded by a causal graph, and show how minimal information regarding the graph can be used to contend with distributional changes. Experiments in multiple settings demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.

Builds on

30 of 60 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  4. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
  5. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
  6. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
  7. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
  8. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  9. 2021Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyondcited by 178
  10. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
  11. 2017Invariant Causal Prediction for Nonlinear Modelscited by 140
  12. 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
18 more
  1. 2017Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributionscited by 126
  2. 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
  3. 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 120
  4. 2020CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Modelscited by 117
  5. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  6. 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
  7. 2015Modeling User Exposure in Recommendationcited by 69
  8. 2021PADA: Example-based Prompt Learning for on-the-fly Adaptation to Unseen Domainscited by 61
  9. 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
  10. 2020Do Offline Metrics Predict Online Performance in Recommender Systems?cited by 25
  11. 2015Estimating the Causal Impact of Recommendation Systems from Observational Datacited by 21
  12. 2021RecSim NG: Toward Principled Uncertainty Modeling for Recommender Ecosystemscited by 21
  13. 2018The Deconfounded Recommender: A Causal Inference Approach to Recommendationcited by 19
  14. 2017Human Interaction with Recommendation Systemscited by 15
  15. 2020A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videoscited by 9
  16. 2014Berk-Nash Equilibrium: A Framework for Modeling Agents with Misspecified Modelscited by 8
  17. 2020Predicting Decisions in Language Based Persuasion Gamescited by 6
  18. 2021Designing an Automatic Agent for Repeated Language based Persuasion Gamescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1.

5 papers.