mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Preemption and Learning in Stochastic Scheduling

arXiv 2205.15695 ↗First posted 31 May 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study single-machine scheduling of jobs, each belonging to a job type that determines its duration distribution. We start by analyzing the scenario where the type characteristics are known and then move to two learning scenarios where the types are unknown: non-preemptive problems, where each started job must be completed before moving to another job; and preemptive problems, where job execution can be paused in the favor of moving to a different job. In both cases, we design algorithms that achieve sublinear excess cost, compared to the performance with known types, and prove lower bounds for the non-preemptive case. Notably, we demonstrate, both theoretically and through simulations, how preemptive algorithms can greatly outperform non-preemptive ones when the durations of different job types are far from one another, a phenomenon that does not occur when the type durations are known.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 28 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 79
  2. 2019Scheduling with Predictions and the Price of Mispredictioncited by 47
  3. 2018On Learning the cμ Rule in Single and Parallel Server Networkscited by 11
  4. 2017An Adversarial Model for Scheduling with Testingcited by 4
  5. 2021Scheduling Jobs with Stochastic Holding Costscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.