mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Simulator-Based Inference with Waldo: Confidence Regions by Leveraging Prediction Algorithms and Posterior Estimators for Inverse Problems

arXiv 2205.15680 ↗First posted 31 May 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prediction algorithms, such as deep neural networks (DNNs), are used in many domain sciences to directly estimate internal parameters of interest in simulator-based models, especially in settings where the observations include images or complex high-dimensional data. In parallel, modern neural density estimators, such as normalizing flows, are becoming increasingly popular for uncertainty quantification, especially when both parameters and observations are high-dimensional. However, parameter inference is an inverse problem and not a prediction task; thus, an open challenge is to construct conditionally valid and precise confidence regions, with a guaranteed probability of covering the true parameters of the data-generating process, no matter what the (unknown) parameter values are, and without relying on large-sample theory. Many simulator-based inference (SBI) methods are indeed known to produce biased or overly confident parameter regions, yielding misleading uncertainty estimates. This paper presents WALDO, a novel method to construct confidence regions with finite-sample conditional validity by leveraging prediction algorithms or posterior estimators that are currently widely adopted in SBI. WALDO reframes the well-known Wald test statistic, and uses a computationally efficient regression-based machinery for classical Neyman inversion of hypothesis tests. We apply our method to a recent high-energy physics problem, where prediction with DNNs has previously led to estimates with prediction bias. We also illustrate how our approach can correct overly confident posterior regions computed with normalizing flows.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.

Builds on

13 of 50 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  3. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  4. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  5. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
  6. 2021Benchmarking Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 160
  7. 2019Distributional conformal predictioncited by 104
  8. 2020Sampling using SU(N) gauge equivariant flowscited by 83
  9. 2018Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inferencecited by 60
  10. 2020Fast covariance parameter estimation of spatial Gaussian process models using neural networkscited by 25
  11. 2021A neural simulation-based inference approach for characterizing the Galactic Center γ-ray excesscited by 12
  12. 2019Adaptive Approximate Bayesian Computation Tolerance Selectioncited by 8
1 more
  1. 2019Component-wise approximate Bayesian computation via Gibbs-like stepscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort: