PAC Generalization via Invariant Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One method for obtaining generalizable solutions to machine learning tasks when presented with diverse training environments is to find textitinvariant representations of the data. These are representations of the covariates such that the best model on top of the representation is invariant across training environments. In the context of linear Structural Equation Models (SEMs), invariant representations might allow us to learn models with out-of-distribution guarantees, i.e., models that are robust to interventions in the SEM. To address the invariant representation problem in a em finite sample setting, we consider the notion of ε-approximate invariance. We study the following question: If a representation is approximately invariant with respect to a given number of training interventions, will it continue to be approximately invariant on a larger collection of unseen SEMs? This larger collection of SEMs is generated through a parameterized family of interventions. Inspired by PAC learning, we obtain finite-sample out-of-distribution generalization guarantees for approximate invariance that holds textitprobabilistically over a family of linear SEMs without faithfulness assumptions. Our results show bounds that do not scale in ambient dimension when intervention sites are restricted to lie in a constant size subset of in-degree bounded nodes. We also show how to extend our results to a linear indirect observation model that incorporates latent variables.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2022.
Builds on
21 of 37 references.
References · 21
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
- 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 622
- 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2020Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional Datacited by 218
- 2016Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approachcited by 182
- 2017Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributionscited by 125
- 2018Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causalitycited by 116
9 more
- 2021Does Invariant Risk Minimization Capture Invariance?cited by 116
- 2018Characterizing and Learning Equivalence Classes of Causal DAGs under Interventionscited by 76
- 2019Permutation-Based Causal Structure Learning with Unknown Intervention Targetscited by 69
- 2020Empirical or Invariant Risk Minimization? A Sample Complexity Perspectivecited by 62
- 2022Provable Domain Generalization via Invariant-Feature Subspace Recoverycited by 32
- 2021Iterative Feature Matching: Toward Provable Domain Generalization with Logarithmic Environmentscited by 30
- 2020A Theory of Multiple-Source Adaptation with Limited Target Labeled Datacited by 18
- 2021Finding Valid Adjustments under Non-ignorability with Minimal DAG Knowledgecited by 10
- 2021Treatment Effect Estimation using Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.