Laplace HypoPINN: Physics-Informed Neural Network for hypocenter localization and its predictive uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Several techniques have been proposed over the years for automatic hypocenter localization. While those techniques have pros and cons that trade-off computational efficiency and the susceptibility of getting trapped in local minima, an alternate approach is needed that allows robust localization performance and holds the potential to make the elusive goal of real-time microseismic monitoring possible. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have appeared on the scene as a flexible and versatile framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) along with the associated initial or boundary conditions. We develop HypoPINN -- a PINN-based inversion framework for hypocenter localization and introduce an approximate Bayesian framework for estimating its predictive uncertainties. This work focuses on predicting the hypocenter locations using HypoPINN and investigates the propagation of uncertainties from the random realizations of HypoPINN's weights and biases using the Laplace approximation. We train HypoPINN to obtain the optimized weights for predicting hypocenter location. Next, we approximate the covariance matrix at the optimized HypoPINN's weights for posterior sampling with the Laplace approximation. The posterior samples represent various realizations of HypoPINN's weights. Finally, we predict the locations of the hypocenter associated with those weights' realizations to investigate the uncertainty propagation that comes from those realisations. We demonstrate the features of this methodology through several numerical examples, including using the Otway velocity model based on the Otway project in Australia.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2022.
Builds on
11 of 38 references.
References · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
- 2019Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principlescited by 158
- 2021Knowledge-Adaptation Priorscited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Approximate Bayesian Neural Operators: Uncertainty Quantification for Parametric PDEscited by 24
- 2022Posterior sampling with CNN-based, Plug-and-Play regularization with applications to Post-Stack Seismic Inversioncited by 0
- 2023Joint Microseismic Event Detection and Location with a Detection Transformercited by 0
- 2023Joint Microseismic Event Detection and Location with a Detection Transformer16 Jul 2023
- 2022Posterior sampling with CNN-based, Plug-and-Play regularization with applications to Post-Stack Seismic Inversion30 Dec 2022
- 2022Approximate Bayesian Neural Operators: Uncertainty Quantification for Parametric PDEs2 Aug 2022