mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sequential Nature of Recommender Systems Disrupts the Evaluation Process

arXiv 2205.13681 ↗First posted 26 May 2022cs.IR cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Datasets are often generated in a sequential manner, where the previous samples and intermediate decisions or interventions affect subsequent samples. This is especially prominent in cases where there are significant human-AI interactions, such as in recommender systems. To characterize the importance of this relationship across samples, we propose to use adversarial attacks on popular evaluation processes. We present sequence-aware boosting attacks and provide a lower bound on the amount of extra information that can be exploited from a confidential test set solely based on the order of the observed data. We use real and synthetic data to test our methods and show that the evaluation process on the MovieLense-100k dataset can be affected by ~1% which is important when considering the close competition. Codes are publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 14 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  2. 2016Fusing Similarity Models with Markov Chains for Sparse Sequential Recommendationcited by 152
  3. 2015The Ladder: A Reliable Leaderboard for Machine Learning Competitionscited by 69
  4. 2019Missing Not at Random in Matrix Completion: The Effectiveness of Estimating Missingness Probabilities Under a Low Nuclear Norm Assumptioncited by 29
  5. 2013Personalized News Recommendation with Context Treescited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.