Learning ReLU networks to high uniform accuracy is intractable
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Statistical learning theory provides bounds on the necessary number of training samples needed to reach a prescribed accuracy in a learning problem formulated over a given target class. This accuracy is typically measured in terms of a generalization error, that is, an expected value of a given loss function. However, for several applications -- for example in a security-critical context or for problems in the computational sciences -- accuracy in this sense is not sufficient. In such cases, one would like to have guarantees for high accuracy on every input value, that is, with respect to the uniform norm. In this paper we precisely quantify the number of training samples needed for any conceivable training algorithm to guarantee a given uniform accuracy on any learning problem formulated over target classes containing (or consisting of) ReLU neural networks of a prescribed architecture. We prove that, under very general assumptions, the minimal number of training samples for this task scales exponentially both in the depth and the input dimension of the network architecture.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.
Builds on
30 of 56 references.
References · 30
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2019Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher Assistantcited by 573
- 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 311
- 2019Ab-Initio Solution of the Many-Electron Schr"odinger Equation with Deep Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2019Deep Neural Network Approximation Theorycited by 93
18 more
- 2019Reverse-Engineering Deep ReLU Networkscited by 83
- 2020On hallucinations in tomographic image reconstructioncited by 68
- 2019Domain Robustness in Neural Machine Translationcited by 65
- 2021The Modern Mathematics of Deep Learningcited by 63
- 2020Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descentcited by 58
- 2020Near-Optimal SQ Lower Bounds for Agnostically Learning Halfspaces and ReLUs under Gaussian Marginalscited by 57
- 2020The gap between theory and practice in function approximation with deep neural networkscited by 54
- 2020Statistical-Query Lower Bounds via Functional Gradientscited by 50
- 2018Fast convergence rates of deep neural networks for classificationcited by 46
- 2018Analysis of the Generalization Error: Empirical Risk Minimization over Deep Artificial Neural Networks Overcomes the Curse of Dimensionality in the Numerical Approximation of Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equationscited by 45
- 2021Proof of the Theory-to-Practice Gap in Deep Learning via Sampling Complexity bounds for Neural Network Approximation Spacescited by 30
- 2021On the Power of Differentiable Learning versus PAC and SQ Learningcited by 28
- 2022Hardness of Noise-Free Learning for Two-Hidden-Layer Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2020Statistical Queries and Statistical Algorithms: Foundations and Applicationscited by 22
- 2017On the Complexity of Learning Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2019How degenerate is the parametrization of neural networks with the ReLU activation function?cited by 15
- 2019Neural network identifiability for a family of sigmoidal nonlinearitiescited by 14
- 2021Stable Recovery of Entangled Weights: Towards Robust Identification of Deep Neural Networks from Minimal Samplescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Data Complexity Estimates for Operator Learningcited by 26
- 2025Theory-to-Practice Gap for Neural Networks and Neural Operatorscited by 4
- 2026Limitations of Learning Tanh Neural Networks with Finite Precisioncited by 1
- 2024Computability of Classification and Deep Learning: From Theoretical Limits to Practical Feasibility through Quantizationcited by 0
- 2026The Information-Theoretic Benefit of Shared Representations under Orthogonality Constraintscited by 0
- 2026The Information-Theoretic Benefit of Shared Representations under Orthogonality Constraints14 Jun 2026
- 2026Limitations of Learning Tanh Neural Networks with Finite Precision9 Jun 2026
- 2025Theory-to-Practice Gap for Neural Networks and Neural Operators23 Mar 2025
- 2024Computability of Classification and Deep Learning: From Theoretical Limits to Practical Feasibility through Quantization12 Aug 2024
- 2024Data Complexity Estimates for Operator Learning25 May 2024