mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Learning Mixture of Linear Regressions in the Non-Realizable Setting

arXiv 2205.13166 ↗First posted 26 May 2022stat.ML cs.IT cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While mixture of linear regressions (MLR) is a well-studied topic, prior works usually do not analyze such models for prediction error. In fact, em prediction and em loss are not well-defined in the context of mixtures. In this paper, first we show that MLR can be used for prediction where instead of predicting a label, the model predicts a list of values (also known as em list-decoding). The list size is equal to the number of components in the mixture, and the loss function is defined to be minimum among the losses resulted by all the component models. We show that with this definition, a solution of the empirical risk minimization (ERM) achieves small probability of prediction error. This begs for an algorithm to minimize the empirical risk for MLR, which is known to be computationally hard. Prior algorithmic works in MLR focus on the em realizable setting, i.e., recovery of parameters when data is probabilistically generated by a mixed linear (noisy) model. In this paper we show that a version of the popular alternating minimization (AM) algorithm finds the best fit lines in a dataset even when a realizable model is not assumed, under some regularity conditions on the dataset and the initial points, and thereby provides a solution for the ERM. We further provide an algorithm that runs in polynomial time in the number of datapoints, and recovers a good approximation of the best fit lines. The two algorithms are experimentally compared.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 505
  2. 2014Statistical guarantees for the EM algorithm: From population to sample-based analysiscited by 131
  3. 2017Mixture Models, Robustness, and Sum of Squares Proofscited by 81
  4. 2017List-Decodable Robust Mean Estimation and Learning Mixtures of Spherical Gaussianscited by 70
  5. 2013Phase Retrieval using Alternating Minimizationcited by 58
  6. 2016Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Emailcited by 54
  7. 2019List-Decodable Linear Regressioncited by 42
  8. 2018Learning Mixtures of Linear Regressions with Nearly Optimal Complexitycited by 37
  9. 2014Tight bounds for learning a mixture of two gaussianscited by 29
  10. 2016Solving a Mixture of Many Random Linear Equations by Tensor Decomposition and Alternating Minimizationcited by 26
  11. 2018Global Convergence of EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two Component Linear Regressioncited by 25
  12. 2013Spectral Experts for Estimating Mixtures of Linear Regressionscited by 22
8 more
  1. 2017Estimating the Coefficients of a Mixture of Two Linear Regressions by Expectation Maximizationcited by 19
  2. 2015Sample-Optimal Density Estimation in Nearly-Linear Timecited by 16
  3. 2019Max-Affine Regression: Provable, Tractable, and Near-Optimal Statistical Estimationcited by 15
  4. 2019Iterative Least Trimmed Squares for Mixed Linear Regressioncited by 13
  5. 2020Alternating Minimization Converges Super-Linearly for Mixed Linear Regressioncited by 12
  6. 2019Sample Complexity of Learning Mixtures of Sparse Linear Regressionscited by 7
  7. 2020Recovery of Sparse Signals from a Mixture of Linear Samplescited by 6
  8. 2021Support Recovery of Sparse Signals from a Mixture of Linear Measurementscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.