mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Fano's Inequality in Ensemble Learning

arXiv 2205.12683 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a fundamental theory on ensemble learning that answers the central question: what factors make an ensemble system good or bad? Previous studies used a variant of Fano's inequality of information theory and derived a lower bound of the classification error rate on the basis of the textitaccuracy and textitdiversity of models. We revisit the original Fano's inequality and argue that the studies did not take into account the information lost when multiple model predictions are combined into a final prediction. To address this issue, we generalize the previous theory to incorporate the information loss, which we name textitcombination loss. Further, we empirically validate and demonstrate the proposed theory through extensive experiments on actual systems. The theory reveals the strengths and weaknesses of systems on each metric, which will push the theoretical understanding of ensemble learning and give us insights into designing systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

13 of 56 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  8. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  9. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  10. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  12. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
1 more
  1. 2020jiant: A Software Toolkit for Research on General-Purpose Text Understanding Modelscited by 39

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.