mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-grained Contrastive Learning for Relation Extraction

arXiv 2205.12491 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent relation extraction (RE) works have shown encouraging improvements by conducting contrastive learning on silver labels generated by distant supervision before fine-tuning on gold labels. Existing methods typically assume all these silver labels are accurate and treat them equally; however, distant supervision is inevitably noisy -- some silver labels are more reliable than others. In this paper, we propose fine-grained contrastive learning (FineCL) for RE, which leverages fine-grained information about which silver labels are and are not noisy to improve the quality of learned relationship representations for RE. We first assess the quality of silver labels via a simple and automatic approach we call "learning order denoising," where we train a language model to learn these relations and record the order of learned training instances. We show that learning order largely corresponds to label accuracy -- early-learned silver labels have, on average, more accurate labels than later-learned silver labels. Then, during pre-training, we increase the weights of accurate labels within a novel contrastive learning objective. Experiments on several RE benchmarks show that FineCL makes consistent and significant performance gains over state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

18 of 33 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019Matching the Blanks: Distributional Similarity for Relation Learningcited by 271
  5. 2019DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Datasetcited by 239
  6. 2016End-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structurescited by 161
  7. 2017Cross-Sentence N-ary Relation Extraction with Graph LSTMscited by 101
  8. 2020Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation Extractioncited by 75
  9. 2020ERICA: Improving Entity and Relation Understanding for Pre-trained Language Models via Contrastive Learningcited by 72
  10. 2018Mem2Seq: Effectively Incorporating Knowledge Bases into End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialog Systemscited by 70
  11. 2021Entity Structure Within and Throughout: Modeling Mention Dependencies for Document-Level Relation Extractioncited by 68
  12. 2016Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction beyond the Sentence Boundarycited by 62
6 more
  1. 2015Relation Classification via Recurrent Neural Networkcited by 46
  2. 2016Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidencecited by 39
  3. 2021SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extractioncited by 23
  4. 2021Manual Evaluation Matters: Reviewing Test Protocols of Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 12
  5. 2021Abstractified Multi-instance Learning (AMIL) for Biomedical Relation Extractioncited by 7
  6. 2022Relation Extraction with Weighted Contrastive Pre-training on Distant Supervisioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.