VIRATrustData: A Trust-Annotated Corpus of Human-Chatbot Conversations About COVID-19 Vaccines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Public trust in medical information is crucial for successful application of public health policies such as vaccine uptake. This is especially true when the information is offered remotely, by chatbots, which have become increasingly popular in recent years. Here, we explore the challenging task of human-bot turn-level trust classification. We rely on a recently released data of observationally-collected (rather than crowdsourced) dialogs with VIRA chatbot, a COVID-19 Vaccine Information Resource Assistant. These dialogs are centered around questions and concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, where trust is particularly acute. We annotated 3k VIRA system-user conversational turns for Low Institutional Trust or Low Agent Trust vs. Neutral or High Trust. We release the labeled dataset, VIRATrustData, the first of its kind to the best of our knowledge. We demonstrate how this task is non-trivial and compare several models that predict the different levels of trust.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2022.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020COVID-Twitter-BERT: A Natural Language Processing Model to Analyse COVID-19 Content on Twittercited by 96
- 2019A Large-scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and Analysiscited by 66
- 2019Automatic Argument Quality Assessment -- New Datasets and Methodscited by 47
- 2019Corpus Wide Argument Mining -- a Working Solutioncited by 36
- 2018Consequences and Factors of Stylistic Differences in Human-Robot Dialoguecited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.