mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Streaming Machine Learning Evaluation

arXiv 2205.11473 ↗First posted 23 May 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While most work on evaluating machine learning (ML) models focuses on computing accuracy on batches of data, tracking accuracy alone in a streaming setting (i.e., unbounded, timestamp-ordered datasets) fails to appropriately identify when models are performing unexpectedly. In this position paper, we discuss how the nature of streaming ML problems introduces new real-world challenges (e.g., delayed arrival of labels) and recommend additional metrics to assess streaming ML performance.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2022.

Builds on

6 of 10 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  2. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  3. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  4. 2022The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagerycited by 93
  5. 2020A simple way to make neural networks robust against diverse image corruptionscited by 30
  6. 2022Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learningcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4.

5 papers.