Unsupervised Tokenization Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the presented study, we discover that the so-called "transition freedom" metric appears superior for unsupervised tokenization purposes in comparison to statistical metrics such as mutual information and conditional probability, providing F-measure scores in range from 0.71 to 1.0 across explored multilingual corpora. We find that different languages require different offshoots of that metric (such as derivative, variance, and "peak values") for successful tokenization. Larger training corpora do not necessarily result in better tokenization quality, while compressing the models by eliminating statistically weak evidence tends to improve performance. The proposed unsupervised tokenization technique provides quality better than or comparable to lexicon-based ones, depending on the language.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2022.
Builds on
8 of 39 references.
References · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 169
- 2022Unsupervised Learning of Temporal Abstractions with Slot-based Transformerscited by 14
- 2014Learning Language from a Large (Unannotated) Corpuscited by 4
- 2022Brain Principles Programmingcited by 4
- 2018Constructing Financial Sentimental Factors in Chinese Market Using Natural Language Processingcited by 2
- 2021Natural Language Generation Using Link Grammar for General Conversational Intelligencecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.