Power and accountability in reinforcement learning applications to environmental policy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) methods already permeate environmental decision-making, from processing high-dimensional data on earth systems to monitoring compliance with environmental regulations. Of the ML techniques available to address pressing environmental problems (e.g., climate change, biodiversity loss), Reinforcement Learning (RL) may both hold the greatest promise and present the most pressing perils. This paper explores how RL-driven policy refracts existing power relations in the environmental domain while also creating unique challenges to ensuring equitable and accountable environmental decision processes. We leverage examples from RL applications to climate change mitigation and fisheries management to explore how RL technologies shift the distribution of power between resource users, governing bodies, and private industry.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2022.
Builds on
7 of 36 references.
References · 7
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 381
- 2019Exploratory Not Explanatory: Counterfactual Analysis of Saliency Maps for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2018Transparency and Explanation in Deep Reinforcement Learning Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2021CropGym: a Reinforcement Learning Environment for Crop Managementcited by 21
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Green Security Games with Real-Time Informationcited by 19
- 2019Deep reinforcement learning in World-Earth system models to discover sustainable management strategiescited by 8
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for Conservation Decisionscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.