Using machine learning on new feature sets extracted from 3D models of broken animal bones to classify fragments according to break agent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distinguishing agents of bone modification at paleoanthropological sites is at the root of much of the research directed at understanding early hominin exploitation of large animal resources and the effects those subsistence behaviors had on early hominin evolution. However, current methods, particularly in the area of fracture pattern analysis as a signal of marrow exploitation, have failed to overcome equifinality. Furthermore, researchers debate the replicability and validity of current and emerging methods for analyzing bone modifications. Here we present a new approach to fracture pattern analysis aimed at distinguishing bone fragments resulting from hominin bone breakage and those produced by carnivores. This new method uses 3D models of fragmentary bone to extract a much richer dataset that is more transparent and replicable than feature sets previously used in fracture pattern analysis. Supervised machine learning algorithms are properly used to classify bone fragments according to agent of breakage with average mean accuracy of 77% across tests.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.
Builds on
2 of 115 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Use and Misuse of Machine Learning in Anthropologycited by 3
- 2022Use and Misuse of Machine Learning in Anthropology6 Sep 2022