mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compression ensembles quantify aesthetic complexity and the evolution of visual art

arXiv 2205.10271 ↗First posted 20 May 2022cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quantification of visual aesthetics and complexity have a long history, the latter previously operationalized via the application of compression algorithms. Here we generalize and extend the compression approach beyond simple complexity measures to quantify algorithmic distance in historical and contemporary visual media. The proposed "ensemble" approach works by compressing a large number of transformed versions of a given input image, resulting in a vector of associated compression ratios. This approach is more efficient than other compression-based algorithmic distances, and is particularly suited for the quantitative analysis of visual artifacts, because human creative processes can be understood as algorithms in the broadest sense. Unlike comparable image embedding methods using machine learning, our approach is fully explainable through the transformations. We demonstrate that the method is cognitively plausible and fit for purpose by evaluating it against human complexity judgments, and on automated detection tasks of authorship and style. We show how the approach can be used to reveal and quantify trends in art historical data, both on the scale of centuries and in rapidly evolving contemporary NFT art markets. We further quantify temporal resemblance to disambiguate artists outside the documented mainstream from those who are deeply embedded in Zeitgeist. Finally, we note that compression ensembles constitute a quantitative representation of the concept of visual family resemblance, as distinct sets of dimensions correspond to shared visual characteristics otherwise hard to pin down. Our approach provides a new perspective for the study of visual art, algorithmic image analysis, and quantitative aesthetics more generally.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.

Builds on

15 of 107 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2020Automated Concatenation of Embeddings for Structured Predictioncited by 86
  5. 2016The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapescited by 69
  6. 2018The Shape of Art History in the Eyes of the Machinecited by 33
  7. 2015Take and Took, Gaggle and Goose, Book and Read: Evaluating the Utility of Vector Differences for Lexical Relation Learningcited by 29
  8. 2021Mapping the NFT revolution: market trends, trade networks and visual featurescited by 24
  9. 2017OmniArt: Multi-task Deep Learning for Artistic Data Analysiscited by 16
  10. 2021Conceptual similarity and communicative need shape colexification: an experimental studycited by 14
  11. 2015Quantifying Creativity in Art Networkscited by 12
  12. 2021Graph Neural Networks for Knowledge Enhanced Visual Representation of Paintingscited by 9
3 more
  1. 2022The Distributed Information Bottleneck reveals the explanatory structure of complex systemscited by 5
  2. 2022Complexity and Aesthetics in Generative and Evolutionary Artcited by 3
  3. 2016A simple method for estimating the fractal dimension from digital images: The compression dimensioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

8 papers.