LAGr: Label Aligned Graphs for Better Systematic Generalization in Semantic Parsing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Semantic parsing is the task of producing structured meaning representations for natural language sentences. Recent research has pointed out that the commonly-used sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) semantic parsers struggle to generalize systematically, i.e. to handle examples that require recombining known knowledge in novel settings. In this work, we show that better systematic generalization can be achieved by producing the meaning representation directly as a graph and not as a sequence. To this end we propose LAGr (Label Aligned Graphs), a general framework to produce semantic parses by independently predicting node and edge labels for a complete multi-layer input-aligned graph. The strongly-supervised LAGr algorithm requires aligned graphs as inputs, whereas weakly-supervised LAGr infers alignments for originally unaligned target graphs using approximate maximum-a-posteriori inference. Experiments demonstrate that LAGr achieves significant improvements in systematic generalization upon the baseline seq2seq parsers in both strongly- and weakly-supervised settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2022.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 284
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
- 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
- 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 135
- 2021The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
- 2018Coarse-to-Fine Decoding for Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 110
- 2020Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing: Pre-training vs. Specialized Architecturescited by 95
11 more
- 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
- 2021Making Transformers Solve Compositional Taskscited by 72
- 2019CLOSURE: Assessing Systematic Generalization of CLEVR Modelscited by 63
- 2021Meta-Learning to Compositionally Generalizecited by 62
- 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
- 2021Unlocking Compositional Generalization in Pre-trained Models Using Intermediate Representationscited by 55
- 2018AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignmentcited by 36
- 2020Compositional Generalization via Semantic Taggingcited by 32
- 2021Learning Algebraic Recombination for Compositional Generalizationcited by 31
- 2020Hierarchical Poset Decoding for Compositional Generalization in Languagecited by 26
- 2021Structured Reordering for Modeling Latent Alignments in Sequence Transductioncited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.