mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Global Binary Masks for Structure Segmentation in Medical Images

arXiv 2205.09107 ↗First posted 13 May 2022eess.IV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) models for medical image segmentation are highly influenced by intensity variations of input images and lack generalization due to primarily utilizing pixels' intensity information for inference. Acquiring sufficient training data is another challenge limiting models' applications. We proposed to leverage the consistency of organs' anatomical shape and position information in medical images. We introduced a framework leveraging recurring anatomical patterns through global binary masks for organ segmentation. Two scenarios were studied.1) Global binary masks were the only model's (i.e. U-Net) input, forcing exclusively encoding organs' position and shape information for segmentation/localization.2) Global binary masks were incorporated as an additional channel functioning as position/shape clues to mitigate training data scarcity. Two datasets of the brain and heart CT images with their ground-truth were split into (26:10:10) and (12:3:5) for training, validation, and test respectively. Training exclusively on global binary masks led to Dice scores of 0.77(0.06) and 0.85(0.04), with the average Euclidian distance of 3.12(1.43)mm and 2.5(0.93)mm relative to the center of mass of the ground truth for the brain and heart structures respectively. The outcomes indicate that a surprising degree of position and shape information is encoded through global binary masks. Incorporating global binary masks led to significantly higher accuracy relative to the model trained on only CT images in small subsets of training data; the performance improved by 4.3-125.3% and 1.3-48.1% for 1-8 training cases of the brain and heart datasets respectively. The findings imply the advantages of utilizing global binary masks for building generalizable models and to compensate for training data scarcity.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2022.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  3. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  4. 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
  5. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
  6. 2017Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNN): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentationcited by 109
  7. 2019Evaluation of Algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An Open-Access Grand Challengecited by 100
  8. 2021SimCVD: Simple Contrastive Voxel-Wise Representation Distillation for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 86
  9. 2021Transferable Visual Words: Exploiting the Semantics of Anatomical Patterns for Self-supervised Learningcited by 68
  10. 2020Post-DAE: Anatomically Plausible Segmentation via Post-Processing with Denoising Autoencoderscited by 38
  11. 2020Semi-supervised Task-driven Data Augmentation for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 24
  12. 2017ConvNet-Based Localization of Anatomical Structures in 3D Medical Imagescited by 9
2 more
  1. 2018Visualizing Convolutional Neural Networks to Improve Decision Support for Skin Lesion Classificationcited by 9
  2. 2020How Can CNNs Use Image Position for Segmentation?cited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.