A Survey on Hyperspectral Image Restoration: From the View of Low-Rank Tensor Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability of capturing fine spectral discriminative information enables hyperspectral images (HSIs) to observe, detect and identify objects with subtle spectral discrepancy. However, the captured HSIs may not represent true distribution of ground objects and the received reflectance at imaging instruments may be degraded, owing to environmental disturbances, atmospheric effects and sensors' hardware limitations. These degradations include but are not limited to: complex noise (i.e., Gaussian noise, impulse noise, sparse stripes, and their mixtures), heavy stripes, deadlines, cloud and shadow occlusion, blurring and spatial-resolution degradation and spectral absorption, etc. These degradations dramatically reduce the quality and usefulness of HSIs. Low-rank tensor approximation (LRTA) is such an emerging technique, having gained much attention in HSI restoration community, with ever-growing theoretical foundation and pivotal technological innovation. Compared to low-rank matrix approximation (LRMA), LRTA is capable of characterizing more complex intrinsic structure of high-order data and owns more efficient learning abilities, being established to address convex and non-convex inverse optimization problems induced by HSI restoration. This survey mainly attempts to present a sophisticated, cutting-edge, and comprehensive technical survey of LRTA toward HSI restoration, specifically focusing on the following six topics: Denoising, Destriping, Inpainting, Deblurring, Super--resolution and Fusion. The theoretical development and variants of LRTA techniques are also elaborated. For each topic, the state-of-the-art restoration methods are compared by assessing their performance both quantitatively and visually. Open issues and challenges are also presented, including model formulation, algorithm design, prior exploration and application concerning the interpretation requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024SSUMamba: Spatial-Spectral Selective State Space Model for Hyperspectral Image Denoisingcited by 20
- 2023Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Spatial-Spectral Recurrent Transformercited by 6
- 2025AI-Driven HSI: Multimodality, Fusion, Challenges, and the Deep Learning Revolutioncited by 1
- 2023Color Image Recovery Using Generalized Matrix Completion over Higher-Order Finite Dimensional Algebracited by 0
- 2023Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Self-Modulating Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025Hyperspectral Image Recovery Constrained by Multi-Granularity Non-Local Self-Similarity Priorscited by 0
- 2026State Space Models Meet Remote Sensing: A Surveycited by 0
- 2026State Space Models Meet Remote Sensing: A Survey24 Jun 2026
- 2025Hyperspectral Image Recovery Constrained by Multi-Granularity Non-Local Self-Similarity Priors2 Aug 2025
- 2025AI-Driven HSI: Multimodality, Fusion, Challenges, and the Deep Learning Revolution9 Feb 2025
- 2024SSUMamba: Spatial-Spectral Selective State Space Model for Hyperspectral Image Denoising2 May 2024
- 2023Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Spatial-Spectral Recurrent Transformer31 Dec 2023
- 2023Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Self-Modulating Convolutional Neural Networks15 Sep 2023
- 2023Color Image Recovery Using Generalized Matrix Completion over Higher-Order Finite Dimensional Algebra4 Aug 2023