mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Probability trees and the value of a single intervention

arXiv 2205.08779 ↗First posted 18 May 2022cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The most fundamental problem in statistical causality is determining causal relationships from limited data. Probability trees, which combine prior causal structures with Bayesian updates, have been suggested as a possible solution. In this work, we quantify the information gain from a single intervention and show that both the anticipated information gain, prior to making an intervention, and the expected gain from an intervention have simple expressions. This results in an active-learning method that simply selects the intervention with the highest anticipated gain, which we illustrate through several examples. Our work demonstrates how probability trees, and Bayesian estimation of their parameters, offer a simple yet viable approach to fast causal induction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2022.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019ABCD-Strategy: Budgeted Experimental Design for Targeted Causal Structure Discoverycited by 52
  2. 2021Entropic Causal Inference: Identifiability and Finite Sample Resultscited by 12
  3. 2020Algorithms for Causal Reasoning in Probability Treescited by 8
  4. 2014Subjectivity, Bayesianism, and Causalitycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.