Fine-resolution landscape-scale biomass mapping using a spatiotemporal patchwork of LiDAR coverages
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating forest AGB at large scales and fine spatial resolutions has become increasingly important for greenhouse gas accounting, monitoring, and verification efforts to mitigate climate change. Airborne LiDAR is highly valuable for modeling attributes of forest structure including AGB, yet most LiDAR collections take place at local or regional scales covering irregular, non-contiguous footprints, resulting in a patchwork of different landscape segments at various points in time. Here, as part of a statewide forest carbon assessment for New York State (USA), we addressed common obstacles in leveraging a LiDAR patchwork for AGB mapping at landscape scales, including selection of training data, the investigation of regional or coverage specific patterns in prediction error, and map agreement with field inventory across multiple scales. Three machine learning algorithms and an ensemble model were trained with FIA field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and topographic, climatic and cadastral geodata. Using a strict set of plot selection criteria, 801 FIA plots were selected with co-located point clouds drawn from a patchwork of 17 leaf-off LiDAR coverages (2014-2019). Our ensemble model was used to produce 30 m AGB prediction surfaces within a predictor-defined area of applicability (98% of LiDAR coverage), and the resulting AGB maps were compared with FIA plot-level and areal estimates at multiple scales of aggregation. Our model was overall accurate (% RMSE 22-45%; MAE 11.6-29.4 Mg ha-1; ME 2.4-6.3 Mg ha-1), explained 73-80% of field-observed variation, and yielded estimates that were consistent with FIA's design-based estimates (89% of estimates within FIA's 95% CI). We share practical solutions to challenges faced in using spatiotemporal patchworks of LiDAR to meet growing needs for AGB mapping in support of applications in forest carbon accounting and ecosystem.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2022.
Builds on
3 of 90 references.
References · 3
- 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 172
- 2020Predicting into unknown space? Estimating the area of applicability of spatial prediction modelscited by 29
- 2022Classification and mapping of low-statured 'shrubland' cover types in post-agricultural landscapes of the US Northeastcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Mapping historical forest biomass for stock-change assessments at parcel to landscape scalescited by 1
- 2026Foundation-Model Earth Representations Enable Regional-Scale Forest Aboveground Biomass Monitoring Across the Northeastern United Statescited by 1
- 2024New allometric models for the USA create a step-change in forest carbon estimation, modeling, and mappingcited by 0
- 2026Foundation-Model Earth Representations Enable Regional-Scale Forest Aboveground Biomass Monitoring Across the Northeastern United States25 Jun 2026
- 2024New allometric models for the USA create a step-change in forest carbon estimation, modeling, and mapping7 May 2024
- 2023Mapping historical forest biomass for stock-change assessments at parcel to landscape scales5 Apr 2023