mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ranking hierarchical multi-label classification results with mLPRs

arXiv 2205.07833 ↗First posted 16 May 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hierarchical multi-label classification (HMC) has gained considerable attention in recent decades. A seminal line of HMC research addresses the problem in two stages: first, training individual classifiers for each class, then integrating these classifiers to provide a unified set of classification results across classes while respecting the given hierarchy. In this article, we focus on the less attended second-stage question while adhering to the given class hierarchy. This involves addressing a key challenge: how to manage the hierarchical constraint and account for statistical differences in the first-stage classifier scores across different classes to make classification decisions that are optimal under a justifiable criterion. To address this challenge, we introduce a new objective function, called CATCH, to ensure reasonable classification performance. To optimize this function, we propose a decision strategy built on a novel metric, the multidimensional Local Precision Rate (mLPR), which reflects the membership chance of an object in a class given all classifier scores and the class hierarchy. Particularly, we demonstrate that, under certain conditions, transforming the classifier scores into mLPRs and comparing mLPR values for all objects against all classes can, in theory, ensure the class hierarchy and maximize CATCH. In practice, we propose an algorithm HierRank to rank estimated mLPRs under the hierarchical constraint, leading to a ranking that maximizes an empirical version of CATCH. Our approach was evaluated on a synthetic dataset and two real datasets, exhibiting superior performance compared to several state-of-the-art methods in terms of improved decision accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 43 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Coherent Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification Networkscited by 65
  2. 2020Interpreting Chest X-rays via CNNs that Exploit Hierarchical Disease Dependencies and Uncertainty Labelscited by 56
  3. 2021Multi-Label Classification Neural Networks with Hard Logical Constraintscited by 36
  4. 2016Product Classification in E-Commerce using Distributional Semanticscited by 9
  5. 2018HierLPR: Decision making in hierarchical multi-label classification with local precision ratescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.