mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Practical Insights of Repairing Model Problems on Image Classification

arXiv 2205.07116 ↗First posted 14 May 2022cs.LG cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Additional training of a deep learning model can cause negative effects on the results, turning an initially positive sample into a negative one (degradation). Such degradation is possible in real-world use cases due to the diversity of sample characteristics. That is, a set of samples is a mixture of critical ones which should not be missed and less important ones. Therefore, we cannot understand the performance by accuracy alone. While existing research aims to prevent a model degradation, insights into the related methods are needed to grasp their benefits and limitations. In this talk, we will present implications derived from a comparison of methods for reducing degradation. Especially, we formulated use cases for industrial settings in terms of arrangements of a data set. The results imply that a practitioner should care about better method continuously considering dataset availability and life cycle of an AI system because of a trade-off between accuracy and preventing degradation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2022.

Builds on

3 of 5 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2020An Empirical Analysis of Backward Compatibility in Machine Learning Systemscited by 38
  3. 2022NeuRecover: Regression-Controlled Repair of Deep Neural Networks with Training Historycited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.