Transformation-Interaction-Rational Representation for Symbolic Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Symbolic Regression searches for a function form that approximates a dataset often using Genetic Programming. Since there is usually no restriction to what form the function can have, Genetic Programming may return a hard to understand model due to non-linear function chaining or long expressions. A novel representation called Interaction-Transformation was recently proposed to alleviate this problem. In this representation, the function form is restricted to an affine combination of terms generated as the application of a single univariate function to the interaction of selected variables. This representation obtained competing solutions on standard benchmarks. Despite the initial success, a broader set of benchmarking functions revealed the limitations of the constrained representation. In this paper we propose an extension to this representation, called Transformation-Interaction-Rational representation that defines a new function form as the rational of two Interaction-Transformation functions. Additionally, the target variable can also be transformed with an univariate function. The main goal is to improve the approximation power while still constraining the overall complexity of the expression. We tested this representation with a standard Genetic Programming with crossover and mutation. The results show a great improvement when compared to its predecessor and a state-of-the-art performance for a large benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2022.
Builds on
5 of 28 references.
References · 5
- 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 219
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
- 2018Learning concise representations for regression by evolving networks of treescited by 33
- 2018A Greedy Search Tree Heuristic for Symbolic Regressioncited by 17
- 2019Semantic variation operators for multidimensional genetic programmingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022Prediction Intervals and Confidence Regions for Symbolic Regression Models based on Likelihood Profilescited by 3
- 2025Alleviating Overfitting in Transformation-Interaction-Rational Symbolic Regression with Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025rEGGression: an Interactive and Agnostic Tool for the Exploration of Symbolic Regression Modelscited by 2
- 2025rEGGression: an Interactive and Agnostic Tool for the Exploration of Symbolic Regression Models29 Jan 2025
- 2025Alleviating Overfitting in Transformation-Interaction-Rational Symbolic Regression with Multi-Objective Optimization3 Jan 2025
- 2022Prediction Intervals and Confidence Regions for Symbolic Regression Models based on Likelihood Profiles14 Sep 2022