mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimal-Degree Polynomial Approximations for Exponentials and Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation

arXiv 2205.06249 ↗First posted 12 May 2022cs.CC cs.DS math.CAcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For any real numbers B ≥ 1 and δ ∈ (0, 1) and function f: [0, B] rightarrow ℝ, let dB; δ (f) ∈ mathbbZ> 0 denote the minimum degree of a polynomial p(x) satisfying supx ∈ [0, B] big| p(x) - f(x) big| < δ. In this paper, we provide precise asymptotics for dB; δ (e-x) and dB; δ (ex) in terms of both B and δ, improving both the previously known upper bounds and lower bounds. In particular, we show dB; δ (e-x) = Thetaleft( max left √B log(δ-1), fraclog(δ-1) log(B-1 log(δ-1)) rightright), and dB; δ (ex) = Thetaleft( max left B, fraclog(δ-1) log(B-1 log(δ-1)) rightright). Polynomial approximations for e-x and ex have applications to the design of algorithms for many problems, and our degree bounds show both the power and limitations of these algorithms. We focus in particular on the Batch Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation problem for n sample points in Theta(log n) dimensions with error δ = n-Theta(1). We show that the running time one can achieve depends on the square of the diameter of the point set, B, with a transition at B = Theta(log n) mirroring the corresponding transition in dB; δ (e-x): - When B=o(log n), we give the first algorithm running in time n1 + o(1). - When B = kappa log n for a small constant kappa>0, we give an algorithm running in time n^1 + O(log log kappa-1 /log kappa-1). The log log kappa-1 /log kappa-1 term in the exponent comes from analyzing the behavior of the leading constant in our computation of dB; δ (e-x). - When B = ω(log n), we show that time n2 - o(1) is necessary assuming SETH.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Fast Attention Requires Bounded Entriescited by 102
  2. 2023How to Capture Higher-order Correlations? Generalizing Matrix Softmax Attention to Kronecker Computationcited by 44
  3. 2024Computational Limits of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) Fine-Tuning for Transformer Modelscited by 31
  4. 2024The Fine-Grained Complexity of Gradient Computation for Training Large Language Modelscited by 30
  5. 2022Bypass Exponential Time Preprocessing: Fast Neural Network Training via Weight-Data Correlation Preprocessingcited by 29
  6. 2024Training Tensor Attention Efficiently: From Cubic to Almost Linear Timecited by 29
  7. 2024Multi-Layer Transformers Gradient Can be Approximated in Almost Linear Timecited by 22
  8. 2024The Computational Limits of State-Space Models and Mamba via the Lens of Circuit Complexitycited by 21
  9. 2024Smoothed Analysis for Learning Concepts with Low Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 11
  10. 2025Fast RoPE Attention: Combining the Polynomial Method and Fast Fourier Transformcited by 9
  11. 2023Streaming Kernel PCA Algorithm With Small Spacecited by 5
  12. 2025Scaling Law Phenomena Across Regression Paradigms: Multiple and Kernel Approachescited by 4
7 more
  1. 2025Subquadratic Algorithms and Hardness for Attention with Any Temperaturecited by 4
  2. 2024Differentially Private Kernel Density Estimationcited by 2
  3. 2025Time and Memory Trade-off of KV-Cache Compression in Tensor Transformer Decodingcited by 2
  4. 2025Theoretical Foundation of Flow-Based Time Series Generation: Provable Approximation, Generalization, and Efficiencycited by 2
  5. 2023On the Fine-Grained Hardness of Inverting Generative Modelscited by 1
  6. 2026Tracking High-order Evolutions via Cascading Low-rank Fittingcited by 0
  7. 2026Approaching I/O-optimality for Approximate Attentioncited by 0