Building for Tomorrow: Assessing the Temporal Persistence of Text Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance of text classification models tends to drop over time due to changes in data, which limits the lifetime of a pretrained model. Therefore an ability to predict a model's ability to persist over time can help design models that can be effectively used over a longer period of time. In this paper, we provide a thorough discussion into the problem, establish an evaluation setup for the task. We look at this problem from a practical perspective by assessing the ability of a wide range of language models and classification algorithms to persist over time, as well as how dataset characteristics can help predict the temporal stability of different models. We perform longitudinal classification experiments on three datasets spanning between 6 and 19 years, and involving diverse tasks and types of data. By splitting the longitudinal datasets into years, we perform a comprehensive set of experiments by training and testing across data that are different numbers of years apart from each other, both in the past and in the future. This enables a gradual investigation into the impact of the temporal gap between training and test sets on the classification performance, as well as measuring the extent of the persistence over time.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2022.
Builds on
19 of 57 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
- 2021Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 230
- 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 221
- 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
- 2016Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encodingcited by 93
- 2018Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: a surveycited by 92
7 more
- 2021Temporal Adaptation of BERT and Performance on Downstream Document Classification: Insights from Social Mediacited by 51
- 2020Time-Aware Evidence Ranking for Fact-Checkingcited by 12
- 2021Opinions are Made to be Changed: Temporally Adaptive Stance Classificationcited by 8
- 2021Mitigation of Diachronic Bias in Fake News Detection Datasetcited by 5
- 2021Capturing Stance Dynamics in Social Media: Open Challenges and Research Directionscited by 4
- 2021The emojification of sentiment on social media: Collection and analysis of a longitudinal Twitter sentiment datasetcited by 2
- 2018Persistence pays off: Paying Attention to What the LSTM Gating Mechanism Persistscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Large Language Models as Financial Data Annotators: A Study on Effectiveness and Efficiencycited by 18
- 2023Examining Temporal Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 4
- 2023Examining Temporalities on Stance Detection towards COVID-19 Vaccinationcited by 3
- 2024Cross-lingual Offensive Language Detection: A Systematic Review of Datasets, Transfer Approaches and Challengescited by 2
- 2024Synergizing Machine Learning & Symbolic Methods: A Survey on Hybrid Approaches to Natural Language Processingcited by 1
- 2024Zero-shot Cross-lingual Stance Detection via Adversarial Language Adaptationcited by 1
- 2025Hatevolution: What Static Benchmarks Don't Tell Uscited by 0
- 2025Decoding the Past: Explainable Machine Learning Models for Dating Historical Textscited by 0
- 2025Decoding the Past: Explainable Machine Learning Models for Dating Historical Texts28 Nov 2025
- 2025Hatevolution: What Static Benchmarks Don't Tell Us13 Jun 2025
- 2024Zero-shot Cross-lingual Stance Detection via Adversarial Language Adaptation22 Apr 2024
- 2024Large Language Models as Financial Data Annotators: A Study on Effectiveness and Efficiency26 Mar 2024
- 2024Synergizing Machine Learning & Symbolic Methods: A Survey on Hybrid Approaches to Natural Language Processing22 Jan 2024
- 2024Cross-lingual Offensive Language Detection: A Systematic Review of Datasets, Transfer Approaches and Challenges17 Jan 2024
- 2023Examining Temporal Bias in Abusive Language Detection25 Sep 2023
- 2023Examining Temporalities on Stance Detection towards COVID-19 Vaccination10 Apr 2023