Bias and Priors in Machine Learning Calibrations for High Energy Physics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning offers an exciting opportunity to improve the calibration of nearly all reconstructed objects in high-energy physics detectors. However, machine learning approaches often depend on the spectra of examples used during training, an issue known as prior dependence. This is an undesirable property of a calibration, which needs to be applicable in a variety of environments. The purpose of this paper is to explicitly highlight the prior dependence of some machine learning-based calibration strategies. We demonstrate how some recent proposals for both simulation-based and data-based calibrations inherit properties of the sample used for training, which can result in biases for downstream analyses. In the case of simulation-based calibration, we argue that our recently proposed Gaussian Ansatz approach can avoid some of the pitfalls of prior dependence, whereas prior-independent data-based calibration remains an open problem.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2022.
Builds on
24 of 123 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2015Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifierscited by 87
- 2021A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physicscited by 77
- 2016Learning to Pivot with Adversarial Networkscited by 55
- 2019Calorimetry with Deep Learning: Particle Simulation and Reconstruction for Collider Physicscited by 42
- 2021MLPF: Efficient machine-learned particle-flow reconstruction using graph neural networkscited by 36
- 2020DCTRGAN: Improving the Precision of Generative Models with Reweightingcited by 22
- 2019Neural Networks for Full Phase-space Reweighting and Parameter Tuningcited by 20
- 2021Understanding Event-Generation Networks via Uncertaintiescited by 17
- 2018INFERNO: Inference-Aware Neural Optimisationcited by 16
12 more
- 2021E Pluribus Unum Ex Machina: Learning from Many Collider Events at Oncecited by 15
- 2021A Convolutional Neural Network based Cascade Reconstruction for the IceCube Neutrino Observatorycited by 13
- 2017Decorrelated Jet Substructure Tagging using Adversarial Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2021A Cautionary Tale of Decorrelating Theory Uncertaintiescited by 11
- 2016Reweighting with Boosted Decision Treescited by 10
- 2022neos: End-to-End-Optimised Summary Statistics for High Energy Physicscited by 10
- 2017Pileup Mitigation with Machine Learning (PUMML)cited by 9
- 2020Adversarial domain adaptation to reduce sample bias of a high energy physics classifiercited by 9
- 2020Dealing with Nuisance Parameters using Machine Learning in High Energy Physics: a Reviewcited by 9
- 2020Optimal statistical inference in the presence of systematic uncertainties using neural network optimization based on binned Poisson likelihoods with nuisance parameterscited by 8
- 2021Transport away your problems: Calibrating stochastic simulations with optimal transportcited by 5
- 2020Deep-Learning-Based Kinematic Reconstruction for DUNEcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.