mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning Diffusion Monte Carlo Energies

arXiv 2205.04547 ↗First posted 9 May 2022cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present two machine learning methodologies that are capable of predicting diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) energies with small datasets (~60 DMC calculations in total). The first uses voxel deep neural networks (VDNNs) to predict DMC energy densities using Kohn-Sham density functional theory (DFT) electron densities as input. The second uses kernel ridge regression (KRR) to predict atomic contributions to the DMC total energy using atomic environment vectors as input (we used atom centred symmetry functions, atomic environment vectors from the ANI models, and smooth overlap of atomic positions). We first compare the methodologies on pristine graphene lattices, where we find the KRR methodology performs best in comparison to gradient boosted decision trees, random forest, gaussian process regression, and multilayer perceptrons. In addition, KRR outperforms VDNNs by an order of magnitude. Afterwards, we study the generalizability of KRR to predict the energy barrier associated with a Stone-Wales defect. Lastly, we move from 2D to 3D materials and use KRR to predict total energies of liquid water. In all cases, we find that the KRR models are more accurate than Kohn-Sham DFT and all mean absolute errors are less than chemical accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 39 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
  2. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
  3. 2016By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learningcited by 65
  4. 2019DScribe: Library of Descriptors for Machine Learning in Materials Sciencecited by 63
  5. 2019Automated Fitting of Neural Network Potentials at Coupled Cluster Accuracy: Protonated Water Clusters as Testing Groundcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.