mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast and Structured Block-Term Tensor Decomposition For Hyperspectral Unmixing

arXiv 2205.03798 ↗First posted 8 May 2022eess.SP cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The block-term tensor decomposition model with multilinear rank-(Lr,Lr,1) terms (or, the "LL1 tensor decomposition" in short) offers a valuable alternative for hyperspectral unmixing (HU) under the linear mixture model. Particularly, the LL1 decomposition ensures the endmember/abundance identifiability in scenarios where such guarantees are not supported by the classic matrix factorization (MF) approaches. However, existing LL1-based HU algorithms use a three-factor parameterization of the tensor (i.e., the hyperspectral image cube), which leads to a number of challenges including high per-iteration complexity, slow convergence, and difficulties in incorporating structural prior information. This work puts forth an LL1 tensor decomposition-based HU algorithm that uses a constrained two-factor re-parameterization of the tensor data. As a consequence, a two-block alternating gradient projection (GP)-based LL1 algorithm is proposed for HU. With carefully designed projection solvers, the GP algorithm enjoys a relatively low per-iteration complexity. Like in MF-based HU, the factors under our parameterization correspond to the endmembers and abundances. Thus, the proposed framework is natural to incorporate physics-motivated priors that arise in HU. The proposed algorithm often attains orders-of-magnitude speedup and substantial HU performance gains compared to the existing three-factor parameterization-based HU algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2022.

Builds on

19 of 64 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 224
  2. 2018Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Signal and Data Analytics: Identifiability, Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 55
  3. 2017On Identifiability of Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 34
  4. 2014A globally convergent algorithm for nonconvex optimization based on block coordinate updatecited by 29
  5. 2016Robust Volume Minimization-Based Matrix Factorization for Remote Sensing and Document Clusteringcited by 28
  6. 2013Nonlinear unmixing of hyperspectral images: models and algorithmscited by 27
  7. 2014Identifiability of the Simplex Volume Minimization Criterion for Blind Hyperspectral Unmixing: The No Pure-Pixel Casecited by 26
  8. 2014Block stochastic gradient iteration for convex and nonconvex optimizationcited by 22
  9. 2013Successive Nonnegative Projection Algorithm for Robust Nonnegative Blind Source Separationcited by 18
  10. 2019Spectrum Cartography via Coupled Block-Term Tensor Decompositioncited by 18
  11. 2015Semiblind Hyperspectral Unmixing in the Presence of Spectral Library Mismatchescited by 13
  12. 2019Block-Randomized Stochastic Proximal Gradient for Low-Rank Tensor Factorizationcited by 12
7 more
  1. 2014Self-Dictionary Sparse Regression for Hyperspectral Unmixing: Greedy Pursuit and Pure Pixel Search are Relatedcited by 10
  2. 2020Hyperspectral Super-Resolution via Interpretable Block-Term Tensor Modelingcited by 10
  3. 2019On the Convergence of Projected-Gradient Methods with Low-Rank Projections for Smooth Convex Minimization over Trace-Norm Balls and Related Problemscited by 8
  4. 2021Identifiability-Guaranteed Simplex-Structured Post-Nonlinear Mixture Learning via Autoencodercited by 7
  5. 2018A Framework for One-Bit and Constant-Envelope Precoding over Multiuser Massive MISO Channelscited by 6
  6. 2021Memory-Efficient Convex Optimization for Self-Dictionary Separable Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: A Frank-Wolfe Approachcited by 6
  7. 2021On Hyperspectral Unmixingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.