mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Odor Descriptor Understanding through Prompting

arXiv 2205.03719 ↗First posted 7 May 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Embeddings from contemporary natural language processing (NLP) models are commonly used as numerical representations for words or sentences. However, odor descriptor words, like "leather" or "fruity", vary significantly between their commonplace usage and their olfactory usage, as a result traditional methods for generating these embeddings do not suffice. In this paper, we present two methods to generate embeddings for odor words that are more closely aligned with their olfactory meanings when compared to off-the-shelf embeddings. These generated embeddings outperform the previous state-of-the-art and contemporary fine-tuning/prompting methods on a pre-existing zero-shot odor-specific NLP benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2022.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  5. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  6. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
  7. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 959
  8. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 669
  9. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
  10. 2017A Continuously Growing Dataset of Sentential Paraphrasescited by 72

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.