mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-grained Intent Classification in the Legal Domain

arXiv 2205.03509 ↗First posted 6 May 2022cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A law practitioner has to go through a lot of long legal case proceedings. To understand the motivation behind the actions of different parties/individuals in a legal case, it is essential that the parts of the document that express an intent corresponding to the case be clearly understood. In this paper, we introduce a dataset of 93 legal documents, belonging to the case categories of either Murder, Land Dispute, Robbery, or Corruption, where phrases expressing intent same as the category of the document are annotated. Also, we annotate fine-grained intents for each such phrase to enable a deeper understanding of the case for a reader. Finally, we analyze the performance of several transformer-based models in automating the process of extracting intent phrases (both at a coarse and a fine-grained level), and classifying a document into one of the possible 4 categories, and observe that, our dataset is challenging, especially in the case of fine-grained intent classification.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2022.

Builds on

7 of 8 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  5. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  6. 2019BERT for Joint Intent Classification and Slot Fillingcited by 195
  7. 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

8 papers.