mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ontology Reuse: the Real Test of Ontological Design

arXiv 2205.02892 ↗First posted 5 May 2022cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reusing ontologies in practice is still very challenging, especially when multiple ontologies are (jointly) involved. Moreover, despite recent advances, the realization of systematic ontology quality assurance remains a difficult problem. In this work, the quality of thirty biomedical ontologies, and the Computer Science Ontology are investigated, from the perspective of a practical use case. Special scrutiny is given to cross-ontology references, which are vital for combining ontologies. Diverse methods to detect potential issues are proposed, including natural language processing and network analysis. Moreover, several suggestions for improving ontologies and their quality assurance processes are presented. It is argued that while the advancing automatic tools for ontology quality assurance are crucial for ontology improvement, they will not solve the problem entirely. It is ontology reuse that is the ultimate method for continuously verifying and improving ontology quality, as well as for guiding its future development. Specifically, multiple issues can be found and fixed primarily through practical and diverse ontology reuse scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.

Builds on

3 of 38 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
  2. 2020The Landscape of Ontology Reuse Approachescited by 7
  3. 2022Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Basecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.