Speaker Recognition in the Wild
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we propose a pipeline to find the number of speakers, as well as audios belonging to each of these now identified speakers in a source of audio data where number of speakers or speaker labels are not known a priori. We used this approach as a part of our Data Preparation pipeline for Speech Recognition in Indic Languages (https://github.com/Open-Speech-EkStep/vakyansh-wav2vec2-experimentation). To understand and evaluate the accuracy of our proposed pipeline, we introduce two metrics: Cluster Purity, and Cluster Uniqueness. Cluster Purity quantifies how "pure" a cluster is. Cluster Uniqueness, on the other hand, quantifies what percentage of clusters belong only to a single dominant speaker. We discuss more on these metrics in section refsec:metrics. Since we develop this utility to aid us in identifying data based on speaker IDs before training an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) model, and since most of this data takes considerable effort to scrape, we also conclude that 98% of data gets mapped to the top 80% of clusters (computed by removing any clusters with less than a fixed number of utterances -- we do this to get rid of some very small clusters and use this threshold as 30), in the test set chosen.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.
Builds on
4 of 10 references.
References · 4
- 2017Generalized End-to-End Loss for Speaker Verificationcited by 293
- 2015Deep clustering: Discriminative embeddings for segmentation and separationcited by 212
- 2019Discriminative Neural Clustering for Speaker Diarisationcited by 14
- 2019Deep learning methods in speaker recognition: a reviewcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.