mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Chasing Streams with Existential Rules

arXiv 2205.02220 ↗First posted 4 May 2022cs.AI cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study reasoning with existential rules to perform query answering over streams of data. On static databases, this problem has been widely studied, but its extension to rapidly changing data has not yet been considered. To bridge this gap, we extend LARS, a well-known framework for rule-based stream reasoning, to support existential rules. For that, we show how to translate LARS with existentials into a semantics-preserving set of existential rules. As query answering with such rules is undecidable in general, we describe how to leverage the temporal nature of streams and present suitable notions of acyclicity that ensure decidability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 33 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018The Vadalog System: Datalog-based Reasoning for Knowledge Graphscited by 25
  2. 2014Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules and Their Application to Query Answering in Ontologiescited by 10
  3. 2017Expressive Stream Reasoning with Lasercited by 7
  4. 2021Materializing Knowledge Bases via Trigger Graphscited by 5
  5. 2018The Window Validity Problem in Rule-Based Stream Reasoningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.