mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Performance-Consistent and Computation-Efficient CNN System for High-Quality Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation

arXiv 2205.01239 ↗First posted 2 May 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The research on developing CNN-based fully-automated Brain-Tumor-Segmentation systems has been progressed rapidly. For the systems to be applicable in practice, a good The research on developing CNN-based fully-automated Brain-Tumor-Segmentation systems has been progressed rapidly. For the systems to be applicable in practice, a good processing quality and reliability are the must. Moreover, for wide applications of such systems, a minimization of computation complexity is desirable, which can also result in a minimization of randomness in computation and, consequently, a better performance consistency. To this end, the CNN in the proposed system has a unique structure with 2 distinguished characters. Firstly, the three paths of its feature extraction block are designed to extract, from the multi-modality input, comprehensive feature information of mono-modality, paired-modality and cross-modality data, respectively. Also, it has a particular three-branch classification block to identify the pixels of 4 classes. Each branch is trained separately so that the parameters are updated specifically with the corresponding ground truth data of a target tumor areas. The convolution layers of the system are custom-designed with specific purposes, resulting in a very simple config of 61,843 parameters in total. The proposed system is tested extensively with BraTS2018 and BraTS2019 datasets. The mean Dice scores, obtained from the ten experiments on BraTS2018 validation samples, are 0.787+0.003, 0.886+0.002, 0.801+0.007, for enhancing tumor, whole tumor and tumor core, respectively, and 0.751+0.007, 0.885+0.002, 0.776+0.004 on BraTS2019. The test results demonstrate that the proposed system is able to perform high-quality segmentation in a consistent manner. Furthermore, its extremely low computation complexity will facilitate its implementation/application in various environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2022.

Builds on

11 of 46 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  7. 2019UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentationcited by 583
  8. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
  9. 2021Latent Correlation Representation Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation with Missing MRI Modalitiescited by 42
  10. 2021A Tri-attention Fusion Guided Multi-modal Segmentation Networkcited by 10
  11. 2018Bottleneck Supervised U-Net for Pixel-wise Liver and Tumor Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.