mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TRUST XAI: Model-Agnostic Explanations for AI With a Case Study on IIoT Security

arXiv 2205.01232 ↗First posted 2 May 2022cs.AI cs.IT math.ITcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite AI's significant growth, its "black box" nature creates challenges in generating adequate trust. Thus, it is seldom utilized as a standalone unit in IoT high-risk applications, such as critical industrial infrastructures, medical systems, and financial applications, etc. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged to help with this problem. However, designing appropriately fast and accurate XAI is still challenging, especially in numerical applications. Here, we propose a universal XAI model named Transparency Relying Upon Statistical Theory (TRUST), which is model-agnostic, high-performing, and suitable for numerical applications. Simply put, TRUST XAI models the statistical behavior of the AI's outputs in an AI-based system. Factor analysis is used to transform the input features into a new set of latent variables. We use mutual information to rank these variables and pick only the most influential ones on the AI's outputs and call them "representatives" of the classes. Then we use multi-modal Gaussian distributions to determine the likelihood of any new sample belonging to each class. We demonstrate the effectiveness of TRUST in a case study on cybersecurity of the industrial Internet of things (IIoT) using three different cybersecurity datasets. As IIoT is a prominent application that deals with numerical data. The results show that TRUST XAI provides explanations for new random samples with an average success rate of 98%. Compared with LIME, a popular XAI model, TRUST is shown to be superior in the context of performance, speed, and the method of explainability. In the end, we also show how TRUST is explained to the user.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2022.

Builds on

13 of 50 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  5. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  6. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 403
  7. 2017What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?cited by 127
  8. 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
  9. 2019Enriching Visual with Verbal Explanations for Relational Concepts -- Combining LIME with Alephcited by 23
  10. 2018An Adversarial Approach for Explainable AI in Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 22
  11. 2019Machine Learning Based Network Vulnerability Analysis of Industrial Internet of Thingscited by 17
  12. 2019SCADA System Testbed for Cybersecurity Research Using Machine Learning Approachcited by 4
1 more
  1. 2019Effect of Imbalanced Datasets on Security of Industrial IoT Using Machine Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

9 papers.