Five Ps: Leverage Zones Towards Responsible AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is a growing debate amongst academics and practitioners on whether interventions made, thus far, towards Responsible AI would have been enough to engage with root causes of AI problems. Failure to effect meaningful changes in this system could see these initiatives to not reach their potential and lead to the concept becoming another buzzword for companies to use in their marketing campaigns. We propose that there is an opportunity to improve the extent to which interventions are understood to be effective in their contribution to the change required for Responsible AI. Using the notions of leverage zones adapted from the 'Systems Thinking' literature, we suggest a novel approach to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, to focus on those that may bring about the real change that is needed. In this paper we argue that insights from using this perspective demonstrate that the majority of current initiatives taken by various actors in the field, focus on low-order interventions, such as short-term fixes, tweaking algorithms and updating parameters, absent from higher-order interventions, such as redefining the system's foundational structures that govern those parameters, or challenging the underlying purpose upon which those structures are built and developed in the first place(high-leverage). This paper presents a conceptual framework called the Five Ps to identify interventions towards Responsible AI and provides a scaffold for transdisciplinary question asking to improve outcomes towards Responsible AI.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2022.
Builds on
6 of 46 references.
References · 6
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
- 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
- 2018Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justicecited by 14
- 2022Tools and Practices for Responsible AI Engineeringcited by 9
- 2020Tackling COVID-19 through Responsible AI Innovation: Five Steps in the Right Directioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.