mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Generalization Performance of Spectral Clustering Algorithms

arXiv 2205.00281 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The theoretical analysis of spectral clustering mainly focuses on consistency, while there is relatively little research on its generalization performance. In this paper, we study the excess risk bounds of the popular spectral clustering algorithms: relaxed RatioCut and relaxed NCut. Firstly, we show that their excess risk bounds between the empirical continuous optimal solution and the population-level continuous optimal solution have a O(1/√n) convergence rate, where n is the sample size. Secondly, we show the fundamental quantity in influencing the excess risk between the empirical discrete optimal solution and the population-level discrete optimal solution. At the empirical level, algorithms can be designed to reduce this quantity. Based on our theoretical analysis, we propose two novel algorithms that can not only penalize this quantity, but also cluster the out-of-sample data without re-eigendecomposition on the overall sample. Experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2022.

Builds on

5 of 52 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018SpectralNet: Spectral Clustering using Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
  2. 2015A variational approach to the consistency of spectral clusteringcited by 28
  3. 2013Spectral Convergence of the connection Laplacian from random samplescited by 19
  4. 2014The geometry of kernelized spectral clusteringcited by 13
  5. 2014Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cutscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.