mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A New Evaluation Method: Evaluation Data and Metrics for Chinese Grammar Error Correction

arXiv 2205.00217 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As a fundamental task in natural language processing, Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) has gradually received widespread attention and become a research hotspot. However, one obvious deficiency for the existing CGEC evaluation system is that the evaluation values are significantly influenced by the Chinese word segmentation results or different language models. The evaluation values of the same error correction model can vary considerably under different word segmentation systems or different language models. However, it is expected that these metrics should be independent of the word segmentation results and language models, as they may lead to a lack of uniqueness and comparability in the evaluation of different methods. To this end, we propose three novel evaluation metrics for CGEC in two dimensions: reference-based and reference-less. In terms of the reference-based metric, we introduce sentence-level accuracy and char-level BLEU to evaluate the corrected sentences. Besides, in terms of the reference-less metric, we adopt char-level meaning preservation to measure the semantic preservation degree of the corrected sentences. We deeply evaluate and analyze the reasonableness and validity of the three proposed metrics, and we expect them to become a new standard for CGEC.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2022.

Builds on

2 of 14 references.

References · 2

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018A Multilayer Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Neural Network for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.