Real or Virtual: A Video Conferencing Background Manipulation-Detection System
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, the popularity and wide use of the last-generation video conferencing technologies created an exponential growth in its market size. Such technology allows participants in different geographic regions to have a virtual face-to-face meeting. Additionally, it enables users to employ a virtual background to conceal their own environment due to privacy concerns or to reduce distractions, particularly in professional settings. Nevertheless, in scenarios where the users should not hide their actual locations, they may mislead other participants by claiming their virtual background as a real one. Therefore, it is crucial to develop tools and strategies to detect the authenticity of the considered virtual background. In this paper, we present a detection strategy to distinguish between real and virtual video conferencing user backgrounds. We demonstrate that our detector is robust against two attack scenarios. The first scenario considers the case where the detector is unaware about the attacks and inn the second scenario, we make the detector aware of the adversarial attacks, which we refer to Adversarial Multimedia Forensics (i.e, the forensically-edited frames are included in the training set). Given the lack of publicly available dataset of virtual and real backgrounds for video conferencing, we created our own dataset and made them publicly available [1]. Then, we demonstrate the robustness of our detector against different adversarial attacks that the adversary considers. Ultimately, our detector's performance is significant against the CRSPAM1372 [2] features, and post-processing operations such as geometric transformations with different quality factors that the attacker may choose. Moreover, our performance results shows that we can perfectly identify a real from a virtual background with an accuracy of 99.80%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2022.
Builds on
11 of 56 references.
References · 11
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
- 2019Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matricescited by 124
- 2020CNN Detection of GAN-Generated Face Images based on Cross-Band Co-occurrences Analysiscited by 42
- 2020A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Adversarial Image Forensicscited by 14
- 2020On the use of Benford's law to detect GAN-generated imagescited by 11
- 2018CNN-Based Detection of Generic Constrast Adjustment with JPEG Post-processingcited by 8
- 2021Do Not Deceive Your Employer with a Virtual Background: A Video Conferencing Manipulation-Detection Systemcited by 3
- 2020FOCAL: A Forgery Localization Framework based on Video Coding Self-Consistencycited by 2
- 2021The privacy protection effectiveness of the video conference platforms' virtual background and the privacy concerns from the end-userscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.