Machine learning of the well known things
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) in its current form implies that an answer to any problem can be well approximated by a function of a very peculiar form: a specially adjusted iteration of Heavyside theta-functions. It is natural to ask if the answers to the questions, which we already know, can be naturally represented in this form. We provide elementary, still non-evident examples that this is indeed possible, and suggest to look for a systematic reformulation of existing knowledge in a ML-consistent way. Success or a failure of these attempts can shed light on a variety of problems, both scientific and epistemological.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2022.
Builds on
3 of 25 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024A Triumvirate of AI Driven Theoretical Discoverycited by 5
- 2022The Splendors and Miseries of Heavisidisationcited by 0
- 2026A new Uncertainty Principle in Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026A new Uncertainty Principle in Machine Learning24 Feb 2026
- 2024A Triumvirate of AI Driven Theoretical Discovery30 May 2024
- 2022The Splendors and Miseries of Heavisidisation15 May 2022